1) Backups of server is a payed service. Totally fair, but it is not noted anywhere inside the platform portal. You have to dig like 3 articles deep to find out the actual costs for backup storage. It would be nice if in the server settings this was more transparent communicated.

2) Once you have multiple servers it is nearly impossible to find out what is actually charged per month for backup storage costs and what is droplet cost. Some reporting on this would be helpfull.

3) And last but not least, I think backup should be optional. I can easily create a custom script and cron job to create backups of applications myself to possibly a cheaper backup storage service. However, I must use the CloudWays backup service and I am forced to pay for this.

Cloudways is still running Git 2.1.4 released on 18-Dec-2014. A handful of really neat features have been added to Git since then. One new feature that would be very helpful to have on Cloudways servers is the updateInstead option for the receive.denyCurrentBranch config added in Git 2.3, which allows pushing directly to the server even if the branch is checked out on the server. This would eliminate the need to set up a repository on an intermediary server. Users could just add their Cloudways server as a remote in their local git repository and push directly from there to the server.

In Cloudways we get to share our server with other CloudWays users. But billing both of the users ( owner & shared account holder ) the complete price of the server is unfair.

Let me break this down:

Let's say "USER A" has 7$ DO 512MB Server and he shares it with "USER B"

Then Cloudways is charging 7$x2 = 14$ from both the users.

"USER B" is getting only CloudWays Console features with the shared server. All the resources are same

Same 512MB ram, Single core Cpu, and 20 GB SSD.

But still, he has to pay total 7$ per month. Which is also being paid by the Owner "USER A".

CloudWays can charge the additional fee that they assign for every server for given support and platform access from both the persons.

But charging for the entire server is unfair.

Essentially, when adding team members to a project, trying to add a user with an email address that is already a customer of cloudways (has an existing account via that email address), will result in an error notification - "You cannot add this email as team member. Use a different email for this user or contact support for more information."

This seems problematic as, with a client on more than one project or across a different account, one can only add the same client by insisting the client maintain several email address for each instance of a team member addition.
I hope that problems makes sense, as the current limitation doesn't make sense to me.

선릉오피's wireless bridge 십구다섬 not (sipgu쩜online) getting speed that I previously 선릉건마s had

I would really 선릉오피 love to increase my 십구닷컴s speed from the wireless switch that I have.
Here is my 선릉건마 setup:

an archer c7 as the router
I have 선릉오피 two nanostation m2 locos as a wireless bridge (wds).십구닷컴....
and I am using a wrt54g router with ddwrt installed as a wireless switch.

I have always gotten 선릉오피 around 15 mbps from the wireless side of the ddwrt 십구닷컴switch.
However, I had to replace one of the m2 locos
because one went 선릉오피 bad. After the install of a new one with same configuration,
I get anywhere from 1-8 mbps. It fluctuates 십구닷컴 pretty bad. According to my configurations page my 선릉오피 is signal

between the two radios differ
from second to second and appear like 십구닷컴 these