Samuel

My feedback

  1. 65 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Add-ons  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  2. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  15 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  3. 312 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    After some difficulties with Cloudflare, we have spoken now with Sucuri (https://sucuri.net/). They offer malware removal, website firewall (providing DDoS protection among other things, requires DNS redirection to point to their firewalls) and site scanning (via local agent). All features independent (we can offer all or some).

    We are thinking that a better approach to solving our customers problems when it comes to security and performance will be to offer (as add-ons) Sucuri (security centric and very focused on our most common apps) and MaxCDN (pure CDN focused on performance).

    Any one has had experience with Sucuri? We have already tested (and in talks with them) and looks very promising.

    Let us know thoughts on this (Sucuri + MaxCDN) approach (vs Cloudfront). We know this is well overdue and want to get it rolling.

    Cloudways Team

    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  4. 121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Service Improvement » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  5. 95 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Stacks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Can any of the supporters please give some scope on what you would like to see implemented when it comes to supporting support?

    • Do you want to be able to launch containers, let Cloudways deploy your preferred app on top of a container (i.e. wordpress) and manage it like you do with other apps in normal virtual machines on Digital Ocean or Vultr?
    • Or you want to be able to deploy your own docker images with your application on top of infrastructure (be it a VMs, a physical host …) that we make available to you?
    • Or something else?

    It will help set our mind related to this. We are discussing options internally, one being adding a container (over physical hardware) infrastructure provider over which you could deploy/manage your applications like done now.

    Cloudways Team

    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  6. 374 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  63 comments  ·  Service Improvement » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Magento  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samuel commented  · 

    It would be nice to specify what types of database object would get copied from staging to live.

    Samuel supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Magento  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Samuel shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base