Greg

My feedback

  1. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Server Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    Yep this would be very helpful when dealing with wp-cron and scheduling imports and exports.

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Service Improvement » Magento  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    This is also the case for Wordpress Apps. If get_temp_dir() is used I would expect it to use the Aaplication tmp folder, instead of the server tmp folder(/tmp/)

    Here is Reference for the function:
    https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/get_temp_dir/

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Console Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  4. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Console Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    This should definitely be a feature cloudways adds to their system for multiple reasons. Would help with security, simplicity of use, a standard other hosting services provide.

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  5. 54 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Console Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    Yeah it also needs to have an option to choose if you want to use the same folder/db name or have cloudways generate a new one. Because currently it doesn't allow you to cloning one site multiple times to another server. It just says the application already exists.

  6. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Service Improvement » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    Yeah there definitely needs to be a better way to handle blocking IP/requests at the server level. Trying to do this at the application level is just inefficient, time consuming and eats up more resources.

    The biggest issue with cloudways is the lack of automatic banning of brute force login attacks and vulnerability scan that are to aggressive. If there was a sever level solution to this Cloudways would be able to offer more secure and stable Cloud server solution then anyone else out there.

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  7. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    Yeah there definitely needs to be a better way to handle blocking IP/requests at the server level. Trying to do this at the application level is just inefficient, time consuming and eats up more resources.

    The biggest issue with cloudways is the lack of automatic banning of brute force login attacks and vulnerability scan that are to aggressive. If there was a sever level solution to this Cloudways would be able to offer more secure and stable Cloud server solution then anyone else out there.

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  8. 178 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Console Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Infrastructure Providers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  10. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Service Improvement » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
    Greg commented  · 

    Why force people to pay for a very expensive service on each of their site? Especially when all of those features and capabilities are not needed. Just a simple scan and alert solution would be great. There are multiple open source malware scanning solutions available out there like https://www.clamav.net/ or any listed on here https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/32138/malware-scanner-for-websites-code. This could be a nice added service to your current offering and help provide a great hosting experience. Especially for those who can afford Sucuri and just want a simple alert system and not a full fledged firewall and hack proof solution.

  11. 54 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Console Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg commented  · 

    Yes it would be very helpful to allow Existing Cloudways Customers(Account Owners) to be added to multiple teams. Currently the work around is to add a different emails address as a team member on multiple teams. It is better then nothing.

  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  13. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  15. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Integrations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  16. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Customer Support  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Service Improvement » Wordpress  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There isn’t any standard specification or list of user agents available to differentiate between the devices.
    However we are assessing situation.

    Regards,
    Cloudways Team

    Greg commented  · 

    yes please add this as a feature to the current Varnish cache settings page to allow for device detection and separate caching for each devices that is configured.

    For example:Our sites have phone specific content that is different from tablet and desktop(usability purpose). So we would need varnish cache to detect phone and create a cached version for them and also create a standard cache for all other devices.

    These links should give you the basic of how to setup varnish cache for different devices based on user agent:
    https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/users-guide/devicedetection.html
    https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-devicedetect
    https://spin.atomicobject.com/2013/02/11/varnish-cache-mobile-devices/

    Greg supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base